|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 9
|
I recently installed a passive Ninja with Thermalright bolt-thru kit on an E6600 based system.
Do the following temperature readings indicate that the system is getting the expected cooling from the Ninja? Is it unusual that this system's Core temp readings are lower than the CPU temp readings? System: Case: Antec Solo mini tower Case fan: 1 x Nexus 120mm @ ~740 RPM. Motherboard: Asus P5W64 WS Pro Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 Processor heatsink: Scythe Ninja Plus Rev B. Passively configured -- no fan. Heatsink bolt kit: Thermalright LGA775 Bolt-Thru-Kit Thermal material remover: ArctiClean Surface Purifier Thermal compound: Arctic Silver 5 Premium Video card: 2 x XFX GeForce 7600GS 2x DVI fanless Memory: Corsair 2x1GB Hard drive: Western Digital Caviar 250GB Optical drive: Samsung DVD±RW DL 20x SATA Power supply: Corsair HX520W Monitors: 3 x Dell UltraSharp 2407WFP-HC 24-inch No other fans, except of course for the one inside the power supply. Test applications: 2 x CPUburn (two concurrent instances) Windows Task Manager Performance screen SpeedFan 4.33 Asus Probe (for validation) CoreTemp 0.96 (for validation) Measurements: Ambient room temperature: Roughly 13C Load: Idle System: 37C CPU: 32C HD0: 36C Core 0: 27C Core 1: 27C Ambient room temperature: Roughly 18C Load: Idle System: 39C CPU: 34C HD0: 38C Core 0: 29C Core 1: 29C Ambient room temperature: Roughly 32C I built a hot fire in the fireplace to create a high ambient temp for testing. I wanted to simulate a worst case environment. Load: Idle System: 46C CPU: 41C HD0: 42C Core 0: 36C Core 1: 36C Ambient room temperature: Roughly 32C Load: Full 100% CPU for an hour. System: 47C CPU: 62C HD0: 43C Core 0: 60C Core 1: 59C |
|
Last edited by ELW; 01-20-2008 at 09:04 PM.. |
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 30
|
are you using coretemp for your core temp readings, speedfan has had some difficulty with offsets in the past, youre real readings will probably be 15c higher as its impossible to have core temp lower than the cpu temp.
strange, temps look fine to me though, very impressive considering there is no fan! |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 9
|
Yes, I used CoreTemp to validate SpeedFan's Core0 and Core1 temp readings.
I used Asus Probe to validate SpeedFan's CPU temp and fan speed readings. The temp readings almost always matched exactly. Occasionally I would see a 1 degree C difference between the tools. My guess is that the temporary difference was caused a sampling lag due to running the CPU at 100%. Here is a snapshot that I took at an intermediate point during the load test in the high ambient temp room. SpeedFan and CoreTemp readings match. |
|
Last edited by ELW; 01-20-2008 at 09:25 PM.. |
|
|
Marketing
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 874
|
Hi,
It looks fine, and I would say it is really great becasue it is "fanless". I would not complain about the temperature you have. Really safe even 32°C ambient.
__________________
* Register and enjoy the official Scythe Forum * Compatibility List for Scythe CPU Coolers |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 9
|
OK, thanks for the feedback.
I'm not sure why the "CPU" temperature readings are higher than the Core readings. My best guess is that the "CPU" readings are possibly not actually CPU but something else? Maybe the Intel 975X chipset reports temps a little differently? |
|
Marketing
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 874
|
Well, I assume that they use a calculation to get close to the temperature of the Cores by that, as the sensor might be bit more far or influenced by other hot components.
It all depends in the Mobo and It's BIOS.
__________________
* Register and enjoy the official Scythe Forum * Compatibility List for Scythe CPU Coolers |