SimplyCool

 


Go Back   Official Scythe Forum > Scythe PC Accessories > Fan Controllers and Thermometers

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2010, 10:20 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 5
Default Better cooling as life insurance for the Potentiometers

I have meanwhile read a lot of complaints about failing potentiometers, which had me checking the temperatures and cooling of my Kaze Server.
Indeed a single Scythe Slipstream (120mm 1200RPM) had the heatsink of the potentiometer where it was connected rise 40°C above ambient at about 600 RPM and heats the neighbour heat sinks up about 10°C each as well. The tiny heatsink could at best be capable of 40 K/W which means it is dissipating 1 W. The Slipstream being specified as 0,26A = ca 3 W and the potentiometer might be burning half of that = 1,5 W, so at least 0,5W are going out the backdoor, means heating the neighbours etc.
The Kaze Server is specifid for 4 channels of 1 A each. Throttling all those by 6 V each means you need to get rid of 4 * 6W if I understand the physics correctly. If we accept 80°C @ 2o°C ambient we need a heatsink with 10 K/W per channel or a shared one with 2,45 W/K.
The Kaze Server heatsinks are underdimensioned by a factor of 4 if I am right.
That's the theory. Thinking practical, 1 A is a lot for a cooler fan and it's not desirable to burn so much energy through simplistic voltage regulation. Even installing a capable heatsink would just bring up the next problem.... moving enough air to transport the heat out of the 5,25" slot. How about a fan to cool the fan controler

For my peace of mind, I invested 1,40 € at Conrad, who happens to have a shop just atround the corner, and bought two heatsinks, part number 188255-24. They are reated at 8,5 K/W each and I plan to fix them on top of the existing heatsinks, joining them into a combined one with approximately 3 K/W. That should keep my potentiometers below 40°C in any realistic scenario.

Jón
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-23-2010, 03:54 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 5
Default Picture

I must admit, that my advents into theory was probably crap
I suspect that the hot components under the heatsinks are some kind of VRM IC's which should stand for a more efficient solution (than pot's only).
Nevertheless my temperature measurement was real, indicating about 50% efficiency only (in that case)
So What ? .... My cute little mod works as expected. I didn't bother to measure as the heatsink now only heats up a little bit
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P1020083.JPG (48.1 KB, 8 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Template-Modifications by TMS
Copyrights by Scythe EU GmbH - All rights reserved - 2007

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55